A digital divide exists in Chicago students' home technology use, but schools do not strongly magnify it along racial or income lines¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2002 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Differences in schools' technology availability and use are not strongly related to the racial composition or family income levels of students in the school. → Holly M. Hart 2002
q2 i? Two significant exceptions: selective admissions high school teachers assign more technology tasks, and predominantly African-American elementary schools show slightly lower computer access. → Holly M. Hart 2002
Evidence¶
Holly M. Hart 2002¶
Holly M. Hart, Elaine Allensworth, Douglas L. Lauen, Robert M. Gladden. (2002). Educational Technology: Availability and Use in Chicago's Public Schools. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/educational-technology-its-availability-and-use-chicagos-public-schools
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Equity analysis of survey and administrative data across 434 schools finds home-use digital divide disparities but small school-level disparities; the second stated exception is that "elementary schools with predominantly African-American enrollments show slightly lower levels of access to computers than other types of schools."
"However, differences in a school's availability and use are not strongly related to the racial composition or family income levels of students in the school . There are only two significant exceptions: First, teachers at selective admissions high schools assign more tasks that require their students use technology"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The home digital divide narrowed by 2003 and schools partially compensated, with predominantly African-American elementary students using school computers more than integrated-school students — related
- Emergency federal funding narrowed the digital access divide during the pandemic but did not close the digital use divide — related
- School improvement rates varied by community type: Latino, racially diverse, and integrated schools improved disproportionately, while stagnation concentrated in predominantly African-American low-income communities — related
- NBCTs are more likely than other teachers to work in magnet schools and less likely to work in the poorest and predominantly African American schools — related
- Grow use is consistently greater in predominantly African-American schools across Chicago — reports the opposite
- The multilevel digital divide presents multiple challenges for parents in technology-integrated family–school partnerships — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
digital-divide-home-not-magnified-by-schools |
title |
A digital divide exists in Chicago students' home technology use, but schools do not strongly magnify it along racial or income lines |
description |
A digital divide exists in Chicago students' home technology use, but schools do not strongly magnify it along racial or income lines |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2002 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — holly-m-hart-2002 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.