Claims

Reviews propose abundant strategies for developing digital literacy and supporting technology integration but provide no evidence of their actual impact

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The umbrella review finds that the strategies proposed in the reviews are seldom evaluated, and that requirements and strategies for developing digital literacy and integrating technology appear strikingly similar. → Olivia Wohlfart 2022

Evidence

Olivia Wohlfart 2022

Olivia Wohlfart, Ingo Wagner. (2022). Teachers' role in digitalizing education: an umbrella review. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10166-0

q3 · i? · review · r3

The umbrella review's discussion of its synthesis of 23 reviews; earlier it notes "the success or effectiveness of these measures in developing teachers' digital literacy is seldom reported." The authors recommend critical discussion, application, and evaluation of these strategies in practice.

"The reviews identify and present an abundance of strategies for "developing" digital literacy and "supporting" technology integration (see Chaps. 4.2.3 & 4.3.1) but provide no evidence of the actual impact of these strategies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.