Survey respondents rated traditional assignments most vulnerable to AI in Computer Science (19 of 20) compared with Humanities & Social Sciences and Professional Degrees (16 of 20 each)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Perceived AI vulnerability of traditional assignments is highest in Computer Science, with Humanities and Professional Degrees somewhat lower but still substantial. → Md Zarzees Uddin Shah Chowdhury and Samin Rahman Khan 2026
Evidence¶
Md Zarzees Uddin Shah Chowdhury and Samin Rahman Khan 2026¶
Md Zarzees Uddin Shah Chowdhury and Samin Rahman Khan. (2026). Evaluation in the Age of AI: Output as Evidence of Learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.22660 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.22660
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Discipline-stratified results from the same n=20 survey (Table 1). Respondents rated Computer Science highest in vulnerability ("19out of20respondents"), versus 16 of 20 in Humanities & Social Sciences and Professional Degrees; the authors attribute CS vulnerability to binary correctness and automated unit-test grading.
"TheDiscipline Divide(95%in Computer Science, representing19out of20respondents, versus80%in both Humanities and Professional Degrees, each at16out of20) suggests that algorithmic or structured tasks are the first to fall."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Computer programmer employment is projected to decline 10% from 2021 to 2031 due to automation, and apprenticeships placed in automation-vulnerable pathways risk reinforcing disparities — related
- Sycophancy concentrates in specific domain-pressure combinations, with Chemistry and Economics highest overall and Biology lowest — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
discipline-divide-ai-vulnerability-cs-highest |
title |
Survey respondents rated traditional assignments most vulnerable to AI in Computer Science (19 of 20) compared with Humanities & Social Sciences and Professional Degrees (16 of 20 each) |
description |
Survey respondents rated traditional assignments most vulnerable to AI in Computer Science (19 of 20) compared with Humanities & Social Sciences and Professional Degrees (16 of 20 each) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — md-zarzees-uddin-shah-chowdhury-and-samin-rahman-khan-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.