Claims

Experimental-group students described literature lessons using the discourse analysis method as enjoyable and confidence-building, reporting increased interest and participation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Students described the lessons as entertaining, relaxing and encouraging self-confidence, and reported increased involvement, interest, participation and motivation. → Kapanadze 2018

Evidence

Kapanadze 2018

Dilek Ünveren Kapanadze. (2018). THE EFFECT OF USING DISCOURSE ANALYSIS METHOD ON IMPROVING COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE SKILLS IN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE TEACHING. European Journal of Education Studies, Volume 4, Issue 5. https://www.oapub.org/edu

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative content analysis of video-recorded opinions from the 20 experimental-group students; affective outcomes such as socialization, communication skills and feeling that individual thought is valuable were coded under an affective-skills theme.

"After applying discourse analysis method, students described language and literature lessons by using positive statements as entertaining, relaxing and encouraging self-confidence; and because they were actually producing ideas, making inferences so they owned and adopted these ideas and lessons"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.