Claims

Experimental-group students reported that the discourse analysis method improved their thinking skills, including analysis, synthesis, inference and critical thinking

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Students in the experimental group self-reported improved analysis and synthesis skills, inference, and critical thinking after the method was applied. → Kapanadze 2018

Evidence

Kapanadze 2018

Dilek Ünveren Kapanadze. (2018). THE EFFECT OF USING DISCOURSE ANALYSIS METHOD ON IMPROVING COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE SKILLS IN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE TEACHING. European Journal of Education Studies, Volume 4, Issue 5. https://www.oapub.org/edu

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative content analysis of video-recorded semi-structured interviews with the 20 experimental-group students, transcribed and coded into themes. These are self-reported perceptions, not tested achievement outcomes.

"After discourse analysis method was applied, student s stated their thoughts as; ‚my analysis and synthesis skills have had improved, I can make inferences, I can think critically, I can deepen my thoughts, I reach at reasonable inferences, I have developed independent thinking skills"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.