Experimental-group students reported that the discourse analysis method improved their thinking skills, including analysis, synthesis, inference and critical thinking¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Students in the experimental group self-reported improved analysis and synthesis skills, inference, and critical thinking after the method was applied. → Kapanadze 2018
Evidence¶
Kapanadze 2018¶
Dilek Ünveren Kapanadze. (2018). THE EFFECT OF USING DISCOURSE ANALYSIS METHOD ON IMPROVING COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE SKILLS IN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE TEACHING. European Journal of Education Studies, Volume 4, Issue 5. https://www.oapub.org/edu
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Qualitative content analysis of video-recorded semi-structured interviews with the 20 experimental-group students, transcribed and coded into themes. These are self-reported perceptions, not tested achievement outcomes.
"After discourse analysis method was applied, student s stated their thoughts as; ‚my analysis and synthesis skills have had improved, I can make inferences, I can think critically, I can deepen my thoughts, I reach at reasonable inferences, I have developed independent thinking skills"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
- Inferencing — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Experimental-group students described literature lessons using the discourse analysis method as enjoyable and confidence-building, reporting increased interest and participation — related
- Non-traditional teaching methods significantly improve critical thinking skills in nursing students compared to control groups — related
- Argumentation Improves Reasoning — related
- Some classroom discussion approaches improve text comprehension, but gains are not uniform across approaches and more student talk alone does not produce them — related
- HOTS-oriented teaching improves disposition towards critical thinking subscales including truth-seeking, open-mindedness, self-confidence, and maturity — related
- The TEFA-T model improves students' critical thinking skills on all measured indicators compared with conventional instruction — related
- Student nurses applied the seven CoRT critical thinking tools when delivering health talks to patients — related
- Students reported their thinking had improved after induction to the critical thinking module — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.