Claims

Discussion boards improve knowledge acquisition, critical and reflective thinking in physiotherapy education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Seven studies found discussion boards improved knowledge acquisition, critical thinking, and reflective thinking. → Mącznik Aleksandra K. 2015

Evidence

Mącznik Aleksandra K. 2015

Mącznik Aleksandra K., Ribeiro Daniel Cury, Baxter G. David. (2015). Online technology use in physiotherapy teaching and learning: a systematic review of effectiveness and users’ perceptions. BMC Medical Education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587774/

q3 · i? · review · r3

Systematic review synthesis of seven studies on discussion boards. Two case studies found "significant improvements in knowledge acquisition (measured by students’ final marks)"; a controlled trial suggested significant improvement in critical thinking; case studies indicated enhanced critical thinking and positive effects on reflective practices.

"Seven studies explored the effect of discussion boards on knowledge acquisition, as well as on development of critical and reflective thinking. Two case studies [28, 29] found significant improvements in knowledge acquisition (measured by students’ final marks) through the use of discussion boards."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.