The disorientation strategy negatively predicted OMR performance in the moderate and ambivalent profiles but not in the positive profile¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Disorientation showed a statistically significant negative effect on OMR performance in G2 and G3, with no significant effect in G1. → Zhu 2026
q2 i? The control strategy showed no significant effects on performance in any group. → Zhu 2026
Evidence¶
Zhu 2026¶
Zhu, S., Yao, Y., Cheong, C. M., & Zhu, X. (2026). Latent motivational-emotional profiles and their effects on strategy use and performance in online multimodal reading tasks: A mixed-methods investigation. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102386
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Multigroup path analysis of behavioral strategies (disorientation, control) on OMR performance across the three profiles; the article characterizes the coefficients as "small to moderate negative associations" and reports no significant effects for disorientation in G1 or for control in any group (p > .05).
"the "Disorientation" strategy in the G2 and G3 demonstrated a statistically significant negative effect, with β = .276, p < .01, and β = .296, p < .01, respectively, indicating small to moderate negative associations"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The ambivalent profile reported the highest OMR strategy use but achieved the lowest OMR performance, while the positive profile scored highest — related
- Ambivalent-profile students undervalued visual information and rigidly applied print-reading strategies, undermining their OMR comprehension — related
- Strategy effectiveness varied across profiles: main idea selection helped only the ambivalent group and trial-and-error helped only the moderate group — related
- Hong Kong fourth graders' OMR self-efficacy and emotions form three distinct motivational-emotional profiles: positive, moderate, and ambivalent — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
disorientation-negative-effect-moderate-ambivalent |
title |
The disorientation strategy negatively predicted OMR performance in the moderate and ambivalent profiles but not in the positive profile |
description |
The disorientation strategy negatively predicted OMR performance in the moderate and ambivalent profiles but not in the positive profile |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zhu-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.