Claims

Bennett et al.'s study engaged a diverse cross-section of university teachers across disciplines and modalities, yet reported common shared design practices

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Despite disciplinary diversity, Bennett et al. reported common, shared practices across the varied cohort of university teachers. → Connolly 2021

Evidence

Connolly 2021

Connolly, C., & Hall, T. (2021). Designing for emergency remote blended and online education: a response to Bennett et al. (2017). Education Tech Research Dev, 69, 281–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09892-0

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

The commentary reports that Bennett et al.'s study, which engaged "a diverse cross-section of university teachers, drawn from a range of different academic disciplines", teaching face-to-face, blended and online, nonetheless "reports common, shared practices across the varied cohort". This is a second-hand report of the reviewed study.

"Interestingly, despite the disciplinary diversity of respondents, and the nuances in their respective approaches, the paper reports common, shared practices across the varied cohort."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.