Claims

Bennett et al.'s study establishes faculty roles as designers of learning, an essential consideration when institutions seek digital design talent.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Faculty roles as designers are established by Bennett et al.'s research and are an essential consideration for institutions seeking digital design talent. → Lohman 2021

Evidence

Lohman 2021

Lohman, L. (2021). Build, buy, or rent? A systems view of faculty design work in the digital learning era. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09899-7

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

The commentary's abstract states this as its reading of Bennett et al.'s research: "establishes faculty roles as designers, which is an essential consideration as institutions seek digital design talent."

"Their work establishes faculty roles as designers, which is an essential consideration as institutions seek digital design talent."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.