Student voices on GenAI and academic integrity are diverse, shaped by gender, academic level, discipline, psychological factors, and cultural context, though gender findings are inconsistent¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Studies consistently show male students report higher confidence in handling academic integrity issues when using GenAI while females express greater concerns, but gender-related findings are inconsistent across studies. → Ji Ying 2026 q2 i? Cultural context shapes ethical perceptions: despite identical institutional policies, Canadian students were consistently more likely than Korean students to perceive GenAI use as unethical. → Ji Ying 2026 (2)

Evidence¶

Ji Ying 2026¶

Ji Ying. (2026). Academic Integrity in the Age of Generative AI: a Scoping Review of Research on Higher Education Student Voices. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09752-1

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's synthesis of demographic moderators reports "male students report higher confidence in handling related academic integrity issues when using GenAI, while females express greater concerns about them", citing Bikanga Ada (2024), and notes some studies found no gender differences.

"male students report higher confidence in handling related academic integrity issues when using GenAI, while females express greater concerns about them"

Ji Ying 2026 (2)¶

Ji Ying. (2026). Academic Integrity in the Age of Generative AI: a Scoping Review of Research on Higher Education Student Voices. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-026-09752-1

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Harrington et al. (2025) found that, despite identical institutional policies, "Canadian students were consistently more likely than Korean students to perceive the use of GenAI as unethical", which the authors interpret via individualistic versus collectivist cultural frameworks and power distance.

"Canadian students were consistently more likely than Korean students to perceive the use of GenAI as unethical and in violation of institutional policies"

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause

Related Claims¶

• Gender effects on self-regulated learning are mediated by culture, discipline, and age, with mixed direction across samples — related
• Male students report significantly higher overall technological self-efficacy than female students (p = 0.001) — related
• Male Chinese HSS students reported higher perceived GenAI gains in independent thinking, creativity and motivation, with minimal gender difference in performance — related
• Research on student voices on academic integrity in GenAI use is nascent and methodologically immature, with most instruments self-developed and all reviewed studies cross-sectional — related
• Learning patterns relate to contextual factors including teaching strategies, perceptions of the learning environment, and discipline — related
• Academic integrity, professional development, and equity concerns about AI span all surveyed units, though interpreted differently — related
• Perceived GenAI gains differ by discipline: arts and economics/management students report stronger cognitive and motivational gains than education and law students — related
• Canadian and Korean students did not differ significantly in overall opinions about GenAI's impact on academic integrity and learning quality, and academic progress did not affect scenario judgments — a narrower finding that bears on this claim