Male students report significantly higher overall technological self-efficacy than female students (p = 0.001)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the full sample, male students reported higher generalized digital confidence (M=4.05) than female students (M=3.89), a statistically significant difference (p=0.001). → Nicolas Rodriguez-Alvarez 2026

Evidence¶

Nicolas Rodriguez-Alvarez 2026¶

Nicolas Rodriguez-Alvarez, Alan Martin Blanch-Marsolini, Samuel Vara-Gutierrez, Hugo Gil-Garcia, Javier Calzon-Dueñas, and Fernando Rodriguez-Merino. (2026). The Illusion of Competence: Self-Perceived Digital Literacy and AI Readiness Among European Secondary Students. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26010 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.26010

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Independent samples t-test with Welch's correction on the survey's gender-based comparison (n=241 after excluding negligible non-binary responses) found males scored higher, a difference the authors call statistically significant.

"male students consistently reported higher generalized digital confidence (𝑀= 4.05) compared to their female counterparts (𝑀= 3.89). This difference was found to be statistically significant (𝑝= 0.001)."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause

Related Claims¶

• Girls show less confidence and interest in math and science from early adolescence, and a strong math/science self-concept predicts course choice and performance for both genders — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
• Secondary students report near-maximum confidence in passive digital tasks but sharply lower confidence in active creation and algorithmic logic — related
• The technological gender gap emerges only within Technology-oriented pathways, with parity in Arts and Sciences — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Gender effects on self-regulated learning are mediated by culture, discipline, and age, with mixed direction across samples — related
• Technology-pathway students report higher active-creation self-efficacy than Arts and Humanities students (p < 0.001) — related
• Both male and female students show statistically significant medium-sized gains in AI knowledge and confidence after a one-day AI literacy workshop — related
• The effects of thoughtless GenAI use on motivation, self-efficacy, and self-directed learning differ significantly by gender — related
• Student voices on GenAI and academic integrity are diverse, shaped by gender, academic level, discipline, psychological factors, and cultural context, though gender findings are inconsistent — related
• Gender differences in GenAI usage clusters are minimal, confined to a male-dominated Zero usage cluster — related
• Male faculty report modestly higher self-perceived GenAI knowledge than female faculty in TK and TPK, with small effect sizes — related
• LLM learners are younger, more likely male, and score higher on technology affinity than non-learners — related
• No statistically significant gender differences in perceived learning outcomes across any dimension among higher vocational students — related
• Female students reported significantly lower initial self-efficacy for quantitative biology problems than male students, with small effect sizes — related
• Gender disparities in CT education show a very small but statistically significant overall effect favoring males (g = 0.106) — related
• No gender differences in writing self-efficacy were found in any included postsecondary study — related
• Male Chinese HSS students reported higher perceived GenAI gains in independent thinking, creativity and motivation, with minimal gender difference in performance — related
• Pedagogical tool significantly moderates the CT gender gap, with programming and robots associated with male-favoring gaps and other tools (e.g., web-based) showing a negative significant effect — related
• Self-efficacy scores differ by cultural identification, while gender shows no significant effect — related
• Gender differences in AI perception scores appear only in the overall score and attitudes dimension, with males scoring higher — related
• The review reports that highly competent PALs increased learners' application of acquired knowledge while low-competent PALs increased self-efficacy — related
• Female student teachers score significantly higher on performance goal orientation than male students, with no gender differences on the other dimensions — reports the opposite