Claims

Double-dose algebra improved test scores but did not reduce algebra failure rates

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Course-passing rates in algebra did not improve under the double-dose policy, even though test scores increased. → Claire Durwood 2010

Evidence

Claire Durwood 2010

Claire Durwood, Emily Krone, and Christopher Mazzeo. (2010). Are Two Algebra Classes Better Than One? The Effects of Double-Dose Instruction in Chicago. Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago. http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/content/page.php?cat=3&content_id=34

q3 · i? · causal · r2

The CCSR mixed-design study (regression discontinuity plus time series) found the policy "fell short of its original goal: to reduce failure rates in algebra"; failure rates that had been modestly improving leveled off after implementation.

"Though students' algebra test scores increased under the policy, course-passing rates did not improve."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id double-dose-did-not-improve-failure-rates
title Double-dose algebra improved test scores but did not reduce algebra failure rates
description Double-dose algebra improved test scores but did not reduce algebra failure rates
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — claire-durwood-2010

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.