The double-dose algebra policy adversely affected non-targeted above-norm students: their algebra grades declined and failure rates increased post-policy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2008 · checked against its sources 2026-10-15 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Among above-norm students, algebra GPAs declined by .12 points on average and failure rates increased by four percentage points from 2002 to 2003. → Takako Nomi and Elaine M. Allensworth 2008
Evidence¶
Takako Nomi and Elaine M. Allensworth 2008¶
Takako Nomi and Elaine M. Allensworth. (2008). “Double-dose” Algebra as an Alternative Strategy to Remediation: Effects on Students’ Academic Outcomes. Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~db=all?content=10.1080/19345740802676739
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Cohort comparison of post-policy versus pre-policy students by percentile rank group (equations 3 and 4); no printed effect size. The article does not establish why grades fell: it offers possible explanations (in its conceptual framework, grades "may be lower" in higher-ability classrooms "due to harder assignments and teachers' perceptual changes"; in its discussion, perceptual changes and more difficult content "could explain" the decline) and says the authors "are investigating these explanations in further work".
"Among above-norm students, GPAs declined by .12 points, on average, while failure rates increased by four percentage points."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Algebraic Thinking — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- Policy effects on grades and failure rates differed by incoming ability: most below-norm students' grades improved slightly, but the very lowest-ability students' algebra grades declined — related
- Algebra failure rates rose post-policy for above-norm students (~3 percentage points) but fell for below-norm students (~4 points); classroom environment and peer ability explained most of the above-norm rise but not the below-norm fall — related
- Evidence on the policy's effects on 10th-grade geometry outcomes was inconsistent across groups and years — related
- For targeted students overall, the policy produced only negligible changes in algebra grades and failure rates despite test-score gains — related
- Failure rates increased and grades declined for higher-skill students in single-period algebra after the policy — related
- Fish pond effects: above-norm students became more likely to fail algebra when their skills were low relative to classroom peers after sorting — related
- The double-dose policy affected non-targeted high-ability students: their algebra test scores improved while their grades declined — related
- Sorting by ability affects grades and pass rates differently from test scores: high-skilled students' grades and pass rates decline while low-skilled students' grades improve — related
- Only 64% of Black Michigan students passed Algebra I by 10th grade in 2021-22, below the 74% statewide average, while white students were the sole group above it at 78% — related
- Double-dose algebra improved test scores but did not reduce algebra failure rates — related
- Alternate Average Adult tests are misplaced: 50% of AI 1 failures and 46% of AI 2 failures came from students with IQ above 110 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
double-dose-policy-harmed-above-norm-grades |
title |
The double-dose algebra policy adversely affected non-targeted above-norm students: their algebra grades declined and failure rates increased post-policy |
description |
The double-dose algebra policy adversely affected non-targeted above-norm students: their algebra grades declined and failure rates increased post-policy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2008 |
source_checked |
2026-10-15 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — takako-nomi-and-elaine-m-allensworth-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.