Claims

Students showed a more positive response toward the DPBL teaching approach than toward direct instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students had a positive response to the DPBL teaching approach and a low response toward the direct instruction method. → Winarno et al. 2017

Evidence

Winarno et al. 2017

Winarno, S., Muthu, K. S., & Ling, L. S. (2017). Direct Problem-Based Learning (DPBL): A Framework for Integrating Direct Instruction and Problem-Based Learning Approach. International Education Studies, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n1p119

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Student-response evaluation in the same quasi-experimental comparison. Table 3 reports for the effective-approach item t = -38.402, df = 271, p = .000, mean difference -2.758; no standardised effect size is printed.

"The majority of the students had a positive response toward DPBL teaching approach. ࢞ൌ4.80(.42) students had a positive response to DPBL teaching approach. Whereas, ࢞ൌ2.04(.72) students had low response toward direct instruction method."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.