Claims

Medical students' satisfaction scores with DPBL exhibit marked variability ranging from 50 to 100%

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Satisfaction scores across the 20 quantitative studies ranged from 50 to 100%, indicating substantial heterogeneity in reported satisfaction with DPBL. → Rathleff Camilla Rams 2025

Evidence

Rathleff Camilla Rams 2025

Rathleff Camilla Rams, Vergel John, Ryberg Thomas, Kristensen Jette Kolding, Telléus Patrik Kjaersdam. (2025). Medical students’ evaluation of digital problem-based learning: a mixed-methods systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07823-2

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The review's discussion of the quantitative synthesis noted that "satisfaction scores exhibited marked variability, ranging from 50 to 100%" and that inconsistencies in measurement approaches were identified across studies.

"satisfaction scores exhibited marked variability, ranging from 50 to 100%, and inconsistencies were identified in how satisfaction was measured across studies"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.