Medical students' satisfaction scores with DPBL exhibit marked variability ranging from 50 to 100%¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Satisfaction scores across the 20 quantitative studies ranged from 50 to 100%, indicating substantial heterogeneity in reported satisfaction with DPBL. → Rathleff Camilla Rams 2025
Evidence¶
Rathleff Camilla Rams 2025¶
Rathleff Camilla Rams, Vergel John, Ryberg Thomas, Kristensen Jette Kolding, Telléus Patrik Kjaersdam. (2025). Medical students’ evaluation of digital problem-based learning: a mixed-methods systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07823-2
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
The review's discussion of the quantitative synthesis noted that "satisfaction scores exhibited marked variability, ranging from 50 to 100%" and that inconsistencies in measurement approaches were identified across studies.
"satisfaction scores exhibited marked variability, ranging from 50 to 100%, and inconsistencies were identified in how satisfaction was measured across studies"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Medical students report a high overall satisfaction rate of 78.51% with digital problem-based learning across 20 studies — related
- Students reported lower difficulty in the DPBL approach than in the direct instruction approach — related
- Students showed a more positive response toward the DPBL teaching approach than toward direct instruction — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.