Claims

DR-TA through tales of virtue produced significantly higher ethical awareness than the traditional approach

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group in ethical awareness, F = 8.77, p = .004. → Chaemsai 2016

Evidence

Chaemsai 2016

Chaemsai, R. & Rattanavich, S. (2016). The Directed Reading-Thinking Activity (DR-TA) and the Traditional Approach Using Tales of Virtue based on His Majesty the King’s Teaching Concepts in Seventh Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n9p18

q3 · i? · causal · r2

One-way MANOVA on the five-choice Likert ethical awareness questionnaire (reliability 0.92) in the randomized pretest-posttest study. Experimental posttest mean was 134.54 versus 130.34 in the control group, and the article reports the experimental group "scored significantly higher than control group in... ethical awareness".

"The experimental group scored significantly higher than control group in English reading comprehension and ethical awareness. (F-statistic = 8.24, p-value = .005 in English reading comprehension; and F-statistic =8.77,p-value = 004 in ethical awareness)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.