Claims

Drama instruction produced higher posttest Turkish verbal skills than conventional curriculum instruction in a randomized pretest-posttest experiment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Seventh-grade students taught with drama for 8 weeks scored significantly higher on Turkish rhetorical skills at posttest than control-group students taught with conventional curriculum activities (p = .001, t = 3.427). → Mehmet Nuri Kardaş & Raşit Koç 2017

Evidence

Mehmet Nuri Kardaş & Raşit Koç 2017

Mehmet Nuri Kardaş & Raşit Koç. (2017). Effect of Drama Instruction Method on Students' Turkish Verbal Skills and Speech Anxiety. International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1131916

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Pretest-posttest experimental model with control group; 18 test and 19 control seventh-grade students, 8 weeks of drama vs. Turkish curriculum activities. Independent samples t-test on TRSS posttest scores: "This numerical difference favoring the test group was found to be statistically significant (p: .001 ˂ 0.05; t: 3.427)."

"Test group mean score was 89, while control group posttest mean score was 78. This numerical difference favoring the test group was found to be statistically significant (p: .001 ˂ 0.05; t: 3.427)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.