Test and control groups were equivalent at pretest on both Turkish verbal skills and speech anxiety¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? There was no significant difference between test and control group pretest verbal skills scores (p = .828, t = .219). → Mehmet Nuri Kardaş & Raşit Koç 2017
q3 i? There was no significant difference between test and control group pretest speech anxiety scores (p = .946, t = .068). → Mehmet Nuri Kardaş & Raşit Koç 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Mehmet Nuri Kardaş & Raşit Koç 2017¶
Mehmet Nuri Kardaş & Raşit Koç. (2017). Effect of Drama Instruction Method on Students' Turkish Verbal Skills and Speech Anxiety. International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1131916
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Independent samples t-test on TRSS pretest scores of 18 test and 19 control students; means 67.56 vs 66.89, "no significant difference between test and control group mean pretest scores (p: .828 ˃ 0.05; t: .219)."
"Statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between test and control group mean pretest scores (p: .828 ˃ 0.05; t: .219). This data demonstrated that the test and control group students had similar verbal skill levels at the beginning of the applications."
Mehmet Nuri Kardaş & Raşit Koç 2017 (2)¶
Mehmet Nuri Kardaş & Raşit Koç. (2017). Effect of Drama Instruction Method on Students' Turkish Verbal Skills and Speech Anxiety. International Journal of Progressive Education, 13(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1131916
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Independent samples t-test on SAS pretest scores; both groups at intermediate anxiety (means 56.61 and 56.36), "the difference between control and test groups speech anxiety levels was not significant (p: .946 ˃ 0.05; t: .068)."
"Statistical analysis showed that the difference between control and test groups speech anxiety levels was not significant (p: .946 ˃ 0.05; t: .068). This result demonstrates that both test and control groups had similar speech anxiety levels before the application."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Conventional curriculum instruction also produced significant pretest-posttest gains in verbal skills and reductions in speech anxiety — related
- Within the drama group, speech anxiety decreased significantly from intermediate to very low level — related
- Within the drama group, Turkish verbal skills improved significantly from pretest to posttest — related
- Drama instruction produced higher posttest Turkish verbal skills than conventional curriculum instruction in a randomized pretest-posttest experiment — related
- Drama instruction reduced students' speech anxiety to a lower level than conventional instruction at posttest — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.