Claims

Drama-based instruction produced statistically significant gains on all five writing aspects: thesis statement, unity, completeness and coherence, wording and cohesion, and organization

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? On the post-test, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on each of the five weighted writing components. → Bataineh 2017

Evidence

Bataineh 2017

Bataineh, R. F., & Salah, N. A. (2017). The Effectiveness of Drama-Based Instruction in Jordanian EFL Students' Writing Performance. TESOL International Journal, 12(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1247797

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Post-test analysis of the five components (Table 4, n=40 per group) shows higher experimental means on every aspect: thesis statement (t = 2.74, Sig. 0.007), unity (t = 2.40, Sig. 0.019), completeness and coherence (t = 2.53, Sig. 0.013), wording and cohesion (t = 2.80, Sig. 0.006), organization (t = 5.55, Sig. 0.000).

"It also shows statistically signifcant differences between the writing performance of the experimental and control groups on all fve aspects, in favor of the former, as detailed below."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.