Claims

Wording and cohesion showed the largest improvement of the five writing aspects under drama-based instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Among the five components, wording and cohesion improved most, which the researchers attribute to the intensive practice involved in drama-based instruction. → Bataineh 2017

Evidence

Bataineh 2017

Bataineh, R. F., & Salah, N. A. (2017). The Effectiveness of Drama-Based Instruction in Jordanian EFL Students' Writing Performance. TESOL International Journal, 12(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1247797

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Component-level post-test comparison (Table 4): wording and cohesion means were 17.58 (experimental) versus 14.88 (control), t = 2.80, df = 78, Sig. 0.006 — the researchers link this to "the intensive practice involved in drama-based instruction".

"Even though marked improvement was observed in the students' scores on the overall test and on the various components, wording and cohesion improved most."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.