Claims

Knowledge scores increased significantly from pretest to immediate posttest in both instruction-order groups

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Both Group A and Group B showed statistically significant score increases on the immediate posttest compared to pretest (p<0.0001). → Dowlati 2016

Evidence

Dowlati 2016

Dowlati, E., Musick, D. W., Zhang, L., Thornton, K., & Carvalho, H. (2016). Use of Dramatization to Teach Cardiac Cycle Physiology to Medical Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i9.1603

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group comparison on the 13-item cardiac cycle assessment administered immediately before and after the dramatization activity. The article reports the increase as "signifi cantly" higher with "p<0.0001" but prints no effect size, so impact is null.

"Scores for both groups increased signifi cantly on the immediate posttest compared to pretest (p<0.0001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.