Drawing support increased rather than decreased perceived difficulty, indicating cognitive overload¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2020 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 The control condition reported significantly lower perceived difficulty than the global and local support conditions, and no support reported less difficulty than global support (partial η2 = 0.10). → Steffen P. Schmidgall 2020
Evidence¶
Steffen P. Schmidgall 2020¶
Steffen P. Schmidgall, Katharina Scheiter, Alexander Eitel. (2020). Can we further improve tablet-based drawing to enhance learning? An empirical test of two types of support. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09513-6
q3 · i2 · causal · r3
ANCOVA on perceived difficulty (extraneous cognitive load) with prior knowledge as covariate, F(3,151) = 5.29, partial η2 = 0.10. The article reports that "the control condition reported statistically significantly lower values of perceived difficulty" than global and local support, and that no support reported less difficulty than global support (SE = 0.29, p = 0.01).
"an ANCOVA with prior knowledge as covariate revealed that the experimental conditions differed statistically significantly with regard to perceived difficulty ratings, F(3,151) = 5.29, MSE = 1.61, p < 0.01, partial η2 = 0.10. Bonferroni-adjusted post-hoc multiple-comparisons showed that the control condition reported statistically significantly lower values of perceived difficulty than the global support (SE = 0.29, p < 0.001) and the local support conditions (SE = 0.29, p = 0.02)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- All three drawing conditions scored better than the control condition on the drawing test and performed equally well — related
- Neither global nor local drawing support increased drawing quality, and local support significantly decreased it relative to unsupported drawing — related
- Prior knowledge and intervention condition predict repeated cognitive load and interest measures: prior knowledge lowers effort and difficulty and raises interest and understanding, and prompting groups perceive tasks as more difficult — related
- Drawing provided no benefit for lower-order recognition knowledge, and the local support condition scored significantly lower than control — related
- Students guided to use LiquidText show lower acceptance of tablets for multiple document work than controls despite better performance — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
drawing-support-increased-perceived-difficulty |
title |
Drawing support increased rather than decreased perceived difficulty, indicating cognitive overload |
description |
Drawing support increased rather than decreased perceived difficulty, indicating cognitive overload |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
source_checked |
2026-10-19 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — steffen-p-schmidgall-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.