The DreamBox effect on the MAP Computation subtest was not statistically significant after WWC multiple-comparison correction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 The MAP Computation subtest showed a raw effect size of 0.15 favoring DreamBox Learning (p = 0.03), but a multiple-comparison correction set a critical p-value of 0.01, so the WWC does not find this result statistically significant. → computation
Evidence¶
computation¶
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2013, December). Elementary School Mathematics intervention report: DreamBox Learning. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/627
q3 · i0 · causal · r3
Supplemental subscale findings from the same RCT (n = 546 for this subtest): intervention mean 163.00 (SD 20.70) versus comparison 158.80 (SD 19.50), effect size 0.15, improvement index +6, p = 0.03. The report notes "the WWC does not find these results to be statistically significant" after correction.
"MAP: Computation subtest Grades K and 1 546 students 163.00 (20.70) 158.80 (19.50) 4.20 0.15 +6 0.03"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The DreamBox effect on the MAP Measurement and Geometry subtest was not statistically significant after WWC multiple-comparison correction — related
- DreamBox Learning produced a statistically significant positive effect on MAP overall math scores for K–1 students — related
- DreamBox effects on the Problem Solving, Number Sense, and Statistics and Probability subtests were not statistically significant — related
- Author-reported statistically significant program effects did not remain significant after WWC corrections for clustering and multiple comparisons — a broader claim this one bears on
- In a randomized study in three high-poverty Bay Area charter schools, K-1 students using DreamBox gained significantly more than control students on the NWEA MAP Measurement and Geometry subtest (ES +0.16) and scored higher overall (ES +0.11) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dreambox-computation-subtest-not-significant-after-correction |
title |
The DreamBox effect on the MAP Computation subtest was not statistically significant after WWC multiple-comparison correction |
description |
The DreamBox effect on the MAP Computation subtest was not statistically significant after WWC multiple-comparison correction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — computation |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.