The DreamBox effect on the MAP Measurement and Geometry subtest was not statistically significant after WWC multiple-comparison correction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 The MAP Measurement and Geometry subtest showed a raw effect size of 0.15 favoring DreamBox Learning (p = 0.03), but the WWC-computed critical p-value of 0.02 means the result is not statistically significant. → measgeom
Evidence¶
measgeom¶
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2013, December). Elementary School Mathematics intervention report: DreamBox Learning. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/InterventionReport/627
q3 · i0 · causal · r3
Supplemental subscale findings from the same RCT (n = 550): intervention mean 155.50 (SD 18.30) versus comparison 151.80 (SD 18.10), effect size 0.15, improvement index +6, p = 0.03. The report states the WWC-computed critical p-value was 0.02 for this subtest, so it is not statistically significant.
"MAP: Measurement and Geometry subtest Grades K and 1 550 students 155.50 (18.30) 151.80 (18.10) 3.70 0.15 +6 0.03"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The DreamBox effect on the MAP Computation subtest was not statistically significant after WWC multiple-comparison correction — related
- DreamBox Learning produced a statistically significant positive effect on MAP overall math scores for K–1 students — related
- DreamBox effects on the Problem Solving, Number Sense, and Statistics and Probability subtests were not statistically significant — related
- Author-reported statistically significant program effects did not remain significant after WWC corrections for clustering and multiple comparisons — a broader claim this one bears on
- Measuring the impact of math instruction and interventions is key to improving students' overall math performance — related
- In a randomized study in three high-poverty Bay Area charter schools, K-1 students using DreamBox gained significantly more than control students on the NWEA MAP Measurement and Geometry subtest (ES +0.16) and scored higher overall (ES +0.11) — reports the opposite
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dreambox-measurement-geometry-subtest-not-significant-after-correction |
title |
The DreamBox effect on the MAP Measurement and Geometry subtest was not statistically significant after WWC multiple-comparison correction |
description |
The DreamBox effect on the MAP Measurement and Geometry subtest was not statistically significant after WWC multiple-comparison correction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — measgeom |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.