Claims

Dropping initially correct items incurred a cost relative to a long-ISI conventional schedule in Experiment 2, but this was offset by gains on initially incorrect items

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Final test performance for initially correct items was significantly lower in the 23-drop group than in the 23-23-23 group. → Pyc 2007 q3 i? In Experiment 1, initially correct items in the 23-drop and 5-drop-after-2 groups did not differ significantly from conventional schedules. → Pyc 2007 (2)

Evidence

Pyc 2007

Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1917-1927. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193420

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Experiment 2 conditional analyses, t(41) = 2.07, p = .044; the authors note "the 23-drop group incurred some cost from discontinuing the practice of initially recalled items." A trend favored 23-drop over 5-5-5, t(41) = 1.83, p = .075.

"final test performance for initially correct items was significantly lower in the 23-drop group than in the 23-23-23 group"

Pyc 2007 (2)

Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1917-1927. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193420

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Experiment 1 conditional analyses (Table 1): 23-drop and 5-drop-after-2 groups, all ts < 1.2; the 5-drop group, by contrast, showed significantly lower performance for initially correct items (t(61) = 6.21 and t(61) = 4.72, p < .001).

"final test performance for initially correct responses for the other two dropout groups did not differ significantly from either conventional schedule"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dropout-cost-for-initially-correct-items
title Dropping initially correct items incurred a cost relative to a long-ISI conventional schedule in Experiment 2, but this was offset by gains on initially incorrect items
description Dropping initially correct items incurred a cost relative to a long-ISI conventional schedule in Experiment 2, but this was offset by gains on initially incorrect items
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — pyc-2007, pyc-2007-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.