Dropping initially correct items incurred a cost relative to a long-ISI conventional schedule in Experiment 2, but this was offset by gains on initially incorrect items¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Final test performance for initially correct items was significantly lower in the 23-drop group than in the 23-23-23 group. → Pyc 2007
q3 i? In Experiment 1, initially correct items in the 23-drop and 5-drop-after-2 groups did not differ significantly from conventional schedules. → Pyc 2007 (2)
Evidence¶
Pyc 2007¶
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1917-1927. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193420
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Experiment 2 conditional analyses, t(41) = 2.07, p = .044; the authors note "the 23-drop group incurred some cost from discontinuing the practice of initially recalled items." A trend favored 23-drop over 5-5-5, t(41) = 1.83, p = .075.
"final test performance for initially correct items was significantly lower in the 23-drop group than in the 23-23-23 group"
Pyc 2007 (2)¶
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1917-1927. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193420
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Experiment 1 conditional analyses (Table 1): 23-drop and 5-drop-after-2 groups, all ts < 1.2; the 5-drop group, by contrast, showed significantly lower performance for initially correct items (t(61) = 6.21 and t(61) = 4.72, p < .001).
"final test performance for initially correct responses for the other two dropout groups did not differ significantly from either conventional schedule"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The dropout schedule was particularly effective for initially incorrect items, an advantage not attributable to initial ISI length and, the authors judge, unlikely to be due to item difficulty in Experiment 2 — related
- A 23-item-ISI dropout schedule achieved final cued-recall performance similar to conventional schedules while using significantly fewer test-restudy trials in two experiments — related
- The effectiveness of dropout schedules depends critically on the length of the interval between presentations of an item — related
- A short-ISI dropout schedule (5-drop) used significantly fewer trials but yielded lower final test performance than conventional schedules in Experiment 1 — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dropout-cost-for-initially-correct-items |
title |
Dropping initially correct items incurred a cost relative to a long-ISI conventional schedule in Experiment 2, but this was offset by gains on initially incorrect items |
description |
Dropping initially correct items incurred a cost relative to a long-ISI conventional schedule in Experiment 2, but this was offset by gains on initially incorrect items |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — pyc-2007, pyc-2007-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.