Claims

The dropout schedule was particularly effective for initially incorrect items, an advantage not attributable to initial ISI length and, the authors judge, unlikely to be due to item difficulty in Experiment 2

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Initially incorrect items were significantly more likely to be correct at final test in the 23-drop group than in either conventional group. → Pyc 2007 q3 i? In Experiment 1, the 23-drop group also showed an advantage for initially incorrect items over both conventional groups. → Pyc 2007 (2)

Evidence

Pyc 2007

Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1917-1927. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193420

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Experiment 2 conditional analyses (Table 2), t(41) = 2.86, p = .007 versus 5-5-5 and t(41) = 2.31, p = .026 versus 23-23-23. Since 23-drop and 23-23-23 shared the same initial ISI and similar numbers of incorrect items, the authors attribute the advantage to additional practice, with 4.7 initially incorrect items receiving four or more trials on average.

"Initially incorrect items were significantly more likely to be correct at final test in the 23-drop group than in either the 5-5-5 group or the 23-23-23 group"

Pyc 2007 (2)

Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2007). Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1917-1927. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193420

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Experiment 1 conditional analyses (Table 1), t(63) = 1.90, p = .067 versus 5-5-5 and t(61) = 2.02, p = .048 versus 1-5-9; 5.1 initially incorrect items received four or more test-restudy trials on average.

"Indeed, this was the case for the 23-drop group, with initially incorrect items more likely to be correct at final test than in the 5-5-5 and 1-5-9 groups"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dropout-benefits-initially-incorrect-items
title The dropout schedule was particularly effective for initially incorrect items, an advantage not attributable to initial ISI length and, the authors judge, unlikely to be due to item difficulty in Experiment 2
description The dropout schedule was particularly effective for initially incorrect items, an advantage not attributable to initial ISI length and, the authors judge, unlikely to be due to item difficulty in Experiment 2
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2007
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — pyc-2007, pyc-2007-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.