Claims

All program types show positive effects when controlling for other influences, with attendance monitoring and incentives, child care, community service, and school restructuring producing the best results

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? When controlling for other influences on outcome, all program types produced positive results, though mentoring and 'other' programs fell short of significance. → Wilson 2011 q3 i? Attendance monitoring & incentives, child care, community service, and school restructuring programs produced the best results among the program types. → Wilson 2011

Evidence

Wilson 2011

Wilson, S. J., Tanner-Smith, E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2011). Dropout Prevention and Intervention Programs: Effects on School Completion and Dropout Among School-aged Children and Youth. 2011 SREE Conference. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/reports/dropout/topic/#top doi:10.4073/csr.2011.8

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Program-type coefficients from the meta-regression (Table 2), e.g., school restructuring (B = 1.41, p = .00), community service (B = 1.74, p = .00), attendance monitoring mixed (B = 2.01, p = .00); mentoring/counseling was not significant (p = .28).

"When controlling for other influences on outcome (e.g., implementation), all program types produced positive results, though the mentoring and “other” programs fell short of significance. Attendance monitoring & incentives, child care, community service, and school restructuring programs produced best results."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dropout-program-type-effectiveness
title All program types show positive effects when controlling for other influences, with attendance monitoring and incentives, child care, community service, and school restructuring producing the best results
description All program types show positive effects when controlling for other influences, with attendance monitoring and incentives, child care, community service, and school restructuring producing the best results
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — wilson-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.