Implementation quality, shorter program duration, and community-based delivery are associated with lower dropout among treated students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Key program characteristics associated with less dropout among treated students were implementation quality, shorter duration programs, and community-based programs. → Wilson 2011
Evidence¶
Wilson 2011¶
Wilson, S. J., Tanner-Smith, E., & Lipsey, M. W. (2011). Dropout Prevention and Intervention Programs: Effects on School Completion and Dropout Among School-aged Children and Youth. 2011 SREE Conference. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/reports/dropout/topic/#top doi:10.4073/csr.2011.8
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Treatment-characteristic moderators from the random-effects meta-regression (Table 2): implementation quality (p = .03), treatment duration (p = .03), and community-based setting (p = .00) were each significantly associated with outcomes.
"Key program characteristics associated with less dropout among treated students included implementation quality, shorter duration programs, and community-based programs."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Unpublished status and higher method quality are associated with smaller estimated effects of dropout programs — related
- Effects of dropout programs on dropout odds are heterogeneous across studies — related
- All program types show positive effects when controlling for other influences, with attendance monitoring and incentives, child care, community service, and school restructuring producing the best results — related
- The review identifies a trend linking AI intervention duration to effect size: longer interventions spanning weeks or months yield larger effect sizes than shorter ones — related
- In the SISTC Logistic Regression model, student-visa holders and longer study duration were linked to retention, while Pakistani nationality and subjects failed were linked to dropout risk — related
- Both preclass (g = 0.186) and postclass (g = 0.536) quizzes enhance learning, with postclass quizzes more effective; benefits increase with treatment duration. — related
- Programme characteristics — longer duration, higher frequency, teacher delivery and older students — were tentatively associated with more significant well-being effects — related
- Program and delivery characteristics moderate SEL effects: implementation quality, duration, skill practice, and delivery agent — related
- Sample characteristics (immigrant/minority status, L2 status, age) show no significant moderator effects, and several program and delivery features are also nonsignificant — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
implementation-duration-community-moderators |
title |
Implementation quality, shorter program duration, and community-based delivery are associated with lower dropout among treated students |
description |
Implementation quality, shorter program duration, and community-based delivery are associated with lower dropout among treated students |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — wilson-2011 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.