Dual Empowerment positively predicts affective, motivational, and cognitive mediating processes¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i2 DE exerts significant positive effects on affective (self-efficacy, flow, resilience), motivational (intrinsic motivation, grit, perceived behavioral control), and cognitive (cognitive engagement, metacognitive regulation) factors (β = .35–.41, p < .01). → Min Jou 2026

Evidence¶

Min Jou 2026¶

Min Jou, Yungwei Hao. (2026). Dual empowerment in VR-based technical training: longitudinal evidence of developmental dynamics in learning outcomes and skill transfer. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-026-10654-7

q2 · i2 · associational · r2

T2 structural mediation model (N = 216) testing H5–H7; the article reports DE "exerted significant positive effects on affective, motiva- tional, and cognitive factors (β = .35–.41, p < .01)". Mediators were adapted from validated scales contextualized for VR-based welding training.

"DE, in turn, exerted significant positive effects on affective, motiva- tional, and cognitive factors (β = .35–.41, p < .01)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• AI Prompting Literacy is indirectly and significantly associated with Deep Revision Engagement through Perceived Competence, Intrinsic Motivation, and Psychological Safety — related
• Perceived Competence, Intrinsic Motivation, and Psychological Safety each significantly positively predict Deep Revision Engagement — related
• AI Prompting Literacy significantly positively predicts Perceived Competence, Intrinsic Motivation, and Psychological Safety among Chinese university EFL learners — related
• Affective, motivational, and cognitive mediators predict both learning outcomes and skill transfer/retention — related
• Pre-actional metacognitive, motivational, and positive-emotional components are positively associated with regulatory behavior in the actional phase, while anger and anxiety are negatively associated — related
• Autonomous regulation correlates positively with self-efficacy, learning strategies, and behavioral engagement, while controlled regulation shows no significant linear relations with these outcomes — related
• Social and organizational support relate to AI well-being indirectly through AI literacy and technological self-efficacy — related
• Self-efficacy and learning motivation serially mediate the link from AIGC affordance to self-regulated learning — related