Claims

The duration of the longest planning interval shows no significant fixed effect on CPS performance but a significant task-dependent random effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No significant fixed effect of the duration of the longest interval between interactions was found on the probability of success in CPS (estimate = -0.05, p = 0.639). → Eichmann 2019 q3 i? A significant random effect for the duration indicator was found, with a correlation between task easiness and the random effect of r = -0.04, indicating the effect varies between tasks but is unrelated to task difficulty. → Eichmann 2019

Evidence

Eichmann 2019

Eichmann, B., Goldhammer, F., Greiff, S., Pucite, L., & Naumann, J. (2019). The role of planning in complex problem solving. Computers & Education, 128, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.004

q3 · i? · associational · r2

GLMM analysis of log data from N = 1346 German students on 21 interactive PISA 2012 CPS tasks found no significant fixed effect for the duration indicator (estimate = -0.05, p = 0.639) but a significant random effect with correlation r = -0.04 with task easiness, showing the effect "varies between tasks but is not related to task di fficulty."

"The correlation between task easiness and the random e ffect of the indicator was r = −0.04. The random e ffect shows that the duration of the longest interval varies between tasks but is not related to task di fficulty."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id duration-planning-interval-no-fixed-effect-cps
title The duration of the longest planning interval shows no significant fixed effect on CPS performance but a significant task-dependent random effect
description The duration of the longest planning interval shows no significant fixed effect on CPS performance but a significant task-dependent random effect
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — eichmann-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.