The duration of the longest planning interval shows no significant fixed effect on CPS performance but a significant task-dependent random effect¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? No significant fixed effect of the duration of the longest interval between interactions was found on the probability of success in CPS (estimate = -0.05, p = 0.639). → Eichmann 2019
q3 i? A significant random effect for the duration indicator was found, with a correlation between task easiness and the random effect of r = -0.04, indicating the effect varies between tasks but is unrelated to task difficulty. → Eichmann 2019
Evidence¶
Eichmann 2019¶
Eichmann, B., Goldhammer, F., Greiff, S., Pucite, L., & Naumann, J. (2019). The role of planning in complex problem solving. Computers & Education, 128, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.004
q3 · i? · associational · r2
GLMM analysis of log data from N = 1346 German students on 21 interactive PISA 2012 CPS tasks found no significant fixed effect for the duration indicator (estimate = -0.05, p = 0.639) but a significant random effect with correlation r = -0.04 with task easiness, showing the effect "varies between tasks but is not related to task di fficulty."
"The correlation between task easiness and the random e ffect of the indicator was r = −0.04. The random e ffect shows that the duration of the longest interval varies between tasks but is not related to task di fficulty."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The variance of planning time shows no significant fixed effect on CPS performance but a significant task-dependent random effect correlated with task difficulty — related
- Significant interaction effects among duration, delay, and variance indicators show that the effects of planning behaviors on CPS performance are highly intertwined — related
- Models including task-dependent random effects fit CPS log data better than models with only fixed effects for all three planning indicators — a broader claim this one bears on
- Early planning in complex problem solving is generally beneficial, with a significant negative fixed effect of the delay indicator — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
duration-planning-interval-no-fixed-effect-cps |
title |
The duration of the longest planning interval shows no significant fixed effect on CPS performance but a significant task-dependent random effect |
description |
The duration of the longest planning interval shows no significant fixed effect on CPS performance but a significant task-dependent random effect |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — eichmann-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.