Significant interaction effects among duration, delay, and variance indicators show that the effects of planning behaviors on CPS performance are highly intertwined¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Significant interaction effects were found for duration-delay (p = 0.013), delay-variance (p = 0.020), and duration-delay-variance (p = 0.036), indicating high interrelatedness of the three planning indicators. → Eichmann 2019
q3 i? The duration indicator is positively related to success when the delay is high but has a very small negative effect when the delay is low; variance is positively related to success when the delay is low and negatively related when the delay is high. → Eichmann 2019
Evidence¶
Eichmann 2019¶
Eichmann, B., Goldhammer, F., Greiff, S., Pucite, L., & Naumann, J. (2019). The role of planning in complex problem solving. Computers & Education, 128, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.004
q3 · i? · associational · r2
A GLMM including fixed effects of all three indicators and their interactions, fitted to log data from N = 1346 German students on 21 interactive PISA 2012 CPS tasks, found "Significant effects were found for the interactions of duration-delay, delay-variance, and duration-delay-variance."
"Significant effects were found for the interactions of duration-delay, delay-variance, and duration-delay-variance. Also the signi ficant effect of the delay indicator was found again."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The duration of the longest planning interval shows no significant fixed effect on CPS performance but a significant task-dependent random effect — related
- Early planning in complex problem solving is generally beneficial, with a significant negative fixed effect of the delay indicator — related
- The variance of planning time shows no significant fixed effect on CPS performance but a significant task-dependent random effect correlated with task difficulty — related
- Models including task-dependent random effects fit CPS log data better than models with only fixed effects for all three planning indicators — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
planning-indicator-interactions-cps |
title |
Significant interaction effects among duration, delay, and variance indicators show that the effects of planning behaviors on CPS performance are highly intertwined |
description |
Significant interaction effects among duration, delay, and variance indicators show that the effects of planning behaviors on CPS performance are highly intertwined |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — eichmann-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.