Claims

Dwell time on the essay correlates positively with the quality of revised essays as assessed by professors

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Dwell time on essay correlated positively with the quality of the revised essays assessed by professors. → Van Meenen 2023

Evidence

Van Meenen 2023

Van Meenen, F., Masson, N., Catrysse, L., & Coertjens, L. (2023). Taking a closer look at how higher education students process and use (discrepant) peer feedback. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101711

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Eye-tracking study of 59 students revising an essay after reading peer feedback; revision quality was assessed by professors. The article reports that "dwell time on essay correlated positively with the quality of the revised essays"; no correlation coefficient is printed.

"Concerning the PF use subphase, dwell time on essay correlated positively with the quality of the revised essays assessed by professors."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id dwell-time-on-essay-correlates-with-revision-quality
title Dwell time on the essay correlates positively with the quality of revised essays as assessed by professors
description Dwell time on the essay correlates positively with the quality of revised essays as assessed by professors
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-meenen-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.