Claims

Design features such as straightforward access, mobile-ready platforms, self-paced modular formats, and scenario-based content are reported facilitators of e-learning implementation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Facilitators included design features supporting accessibility and ease of use, adaptability such as self-paced modular formats, and perceived usefulness for professional roles. → Jørgensen Louise Bidstrup 2026

Evidence

Jørgensen Louise Bidstrup 2026

Jørgensen Louise Bidstrup, Jensen Jette Nygaard, Clausen Caroline Skovsbo, Kousgaard Marius Brostrøm, Arnold Sif Helene. (2026). Barriers and facilitators to implementing e-learning for infection management in primary care: a scoping review. BMC Primary Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03385-4

q2 · i? · review · r3

Scoping review synthesis of facilitators across the included studies, mapped to CFIR Innovation, Inner setting, and Individuals domains. The review lists "straightforward access, mobile-ready platforms, brief interactive scenarios" as facilitators. No effect sizes reported.

"facilitators included design features that supported accessibility and ease of use (e.g., straightforward access, mobile-ready platforms, brief interactive scenarios) [27–30], adaptability (e.g., self-paced modular formats) [27–29], and perceived usefulness for professional roles [28–30]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.