Claims

E-learning-enriched physics teaching significantly improved scientific thinking scores from pre-test to post-test in the experimental group of intermediate girls

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group showed a statistically significant pre-to-post gain in scientific thinking (t = 11.383 > 2.042, df = 31). → Hameed 2016

Evidence

Hameed 2016

Hameed, Saddam Mohammed; Mohammed, Essam Mahmoud. (2016). Enrich the Physics Curriculum Scheduled for Students of Intermediate School E-Learning and Its Effectiveness in Scientific Thinking and Their Attitude Towards the Development of Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105303

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with equal groups: 32 second-grade intermediate girls taught with the e-learning-enriched curriculum for 35 days. Post-test mean was 17.812 versus pre-test 14.031; the paired t-test was significant, "the difference is significant between the mean scores of pre and post tests for experimental group".

"the calculated t-value (11.383) is greater than the tabulated t (2.042) at the level of ( 0.05) and the degree of freedom (31) This means that the difference is significant between the mean scores of pre and post tests for experimental group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.