E-learning in VET affects theoretical learning and only computer-media practical learning, not conventional machine-tool practical learning¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? E-learning's effect in VET is confined to theoretical learning outcomes and practical learning that uses computer and internet media such as digital simulation and web programming. → Daryanto 2022
q3 i? E-learning cannot be used as the primary form of conventional practical learning that uses machine tools; in such learning it serves only as enrichment. → Daryanto 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Daryanto 2022¶
Daryanto, E., Siregar, B., & Januariyansah, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of the e-learning influence on Vocational Education and Training (VET): Preliminary study of virtual to actualization. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 10(3), 710-721. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2509
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
Meta-analysis findings from the Results and Discussion section of 18 VET e-learning studies. The authors report that for practice-type learning, "e -learning can only be used in practical learning that utilizes computer learning media" such as digital simulations and web development.
"However, for practice type, e -learning can only be used in practical learning that utilizes computer learning media such as digital simulations and web development."
Daryanto 2022 (2)¶
Daryanto, E., Siregar, B., & Januariyansah, S. (2022). A meta-analysis of the e-learning influence on Vocational Education and Training (VET): Preliminary study of virtual to actualization. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IJEMST), 10(3), 710-721. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2509
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
The same meta-analysis discussion reports that e-learning "is considered unable to accommodate conventional practical learning using machine tools", citing Tabakova (2020), and positions e-learning in conventional learning as enrichment only.
"However, e -learning is considered unable to accommodate conventional practical learning using machine tools. Thus, e -learning in conventional learning is only enrichment (Tabakova, 2020)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- PISA-VET has stated limitations: limited occupational coverage, context sensitivity, simulation limits, and CBET generalizability concerns — related
- Simulator-based VET instruction in this study centres on volume training of routine tasks rather than rehearsing specific high-stakes, risky situations. — related
- PISA-VET combines digitalized simulations with hands-on demonstrations to increase measurement validity and engagement — related
- Digital-competency disparities may confound computerized PISA-VET assessments of vocational competence — related
- E-learning has a significant positive influence on VET learning, with an average effect size of η² = 0.344 across 18 studies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.