The effect size of using e-Mind Maps on fifth-graders' English achievement was high (η² = 0.39)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 Eta square for the effect of e-Mind Maps on achievement was η² = 0.39, which the article describes as a high effect size (39% of variation attributed to the independent variable). → Afaf M. Aljaser 2017
Evidence¶
Afaf M. Aljaser 2017¶
Afaf M. Aljaser. (2017). The Effectiveness of Electronic Mind Maps in Developing Academic Achievement and the Attitude towards Learning English among Primary School Students. International Education Studies, Vol. 10, No. 12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n12p80
q2 · i3 · causal · r1
Eta square computed from the T-value comparing the two groups of 15 on the post-achievement test. The article prints the effect size η² = 0.39, reporting that "the calculated η2 of the achievement test was 0.39" and calling it a high degree, exceeding the medium effect sizes reported by earlier studies it cites.
"Table 6 shows that the value of the calculated η2 of the achievement test was 0.39 , indicating that the effect size of the independent variable, i.e. using e-Mind Maps on the academic achievement of the fifth-grade primary female students in the English language curriculum, was 39%. It is a high degree."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The effect of using electronic mind maps on ninth-graders' reading comprehension was medium in size — related
- Fifth-grade female students taught an English unit with e-Mind Maps scored significantly higher on the post achievement test than students taught with the traditional teacher-guide method — related
- Elementary ESL students taught vocabulary with the MPS on an interactive whiteboard achieved significantly higher post-test scores than students taught with a blackboard — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.