Claims

Elementary ESL students taught vocabulary with the MPS on an interactive whiteboard achieved significantly higher post-test scores than students taught with a blackboard

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Fifth-graders using the MPS scored significantly higher on an English vocabulary post-test than blackboard-taught peers (79.78 vs 76.20, p < .05). → Kuo 2013

Evidence

Kuo 2013

Kuo, F.-O., Yu, P.-T., & Hsiao, W.-H. (2013). Develop and evaluate the effects of multimodal presentation system on elementary ESL students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1018039

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 134 fifth-graders in six intact classes randomly assigned to instructional approach; independent-samples t-test on post-test vocabulary scores. The experimental group mean was "higher than the 76.20 (SD = 8.61) for the control group", t(125.794) = 2.087, p < .05.

"The mean of scores was 79.78 (SD = 11.13) for the experimental group, higher than the 76.20 (SD = 8.61) for the control group. There is a significant difference between these two groups, t(125.794) = 2.087, p < .05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.