The non-pretested Advance Organizer group (E2) scored significantly higher than the pretested one (E1) on the post-test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The Tukey comparison of E2 vs E1 showed a mean difference of 1.12, significant at p = 0.03, favouring the group that did not sit the pre-test. → Muiruri et al. 2016

Evidence¶

Muiruri et al. 2016¶

Mary Muiruri, Patriciah Wambugu, Kuria Wamukuru. (2016). Using Advance Organizers to Enhance Pupils' Achievement in Poetry in English Language. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(31). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1122519

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Tukey post-hoc comparison of the two experimental groups' post-test PPAT scores (E2 mean 9.85, n=34; E1 mean 8.77, n=45); the printed row shows a mean difference of 1.12 at p = 0.03, not marked with the article's significance asterisk convention used for the 0.000 rows.

"E2 v/s E 1 1.12 0.03"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Pupils taught poetry with Advance Organizers achieved significantly higher post-test scores than pupils taught with conventional teaching methods — related
• Tukey post-hoc comparisons show each Advance Organizer group significantly outperformed each control group on the poetry post-test — related
• Descriptive gains show the experimental group's attitude change exceeded the control group's, and pretesting had no effect on the intervention — related
• The only significant pairwise post-test difference in attitudes was between two e-learning-taught groups differing only in pre-test exposure, favouring the pre-tested group — reports the opposite