Tukey post-hoc comparisons show each Advance Organizer group significantly outperformed each control group on the poetry post-test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? All four experimental-versus-control pairwise comparisons (E1 vs C1, E1 vs C2, E2 vs C1, E2 vs C2) were significant at the 0.05 level, with mean differences from 2.02 to 3.35. → Muiruri et al. 2016

Evidence¶

Muiruri et al. 2016¶

Mary Muiruri, Patriciah Wambugu, Kuria Wamukuru. (2016). Using Advance Organizers to Enhance Pupils' Achievement in Poetry in English Language. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(31). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1122519

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Tukey post-hoc multiple comparisons following the significant ANOVA on post-test PPAT scores; the printed mean differences were C1 vs E1 2.23, C1 vs E2 3.35, C2 vs E1 2.02, C2 vs E2 2.14, each at p = 0.000, indicating "the use of AO improved the achievement in poetry".

"Table 3 shows that the scores of groups E1 and C1, groups E1 and C2, groups E2 and C1 and groups E2 and C2 were statistically significant at 0.05 level."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Pupils taught poetry with Advance Organizers achieved significantly higher post-test scores than pupils taught with conventional teaching methods — a broader claim this one bears on
• The non-pretested Advance Organizer group (E2) scored significantly higher than the pretested one (E1) on the post-test — related
• Both the movie-adaptation and news-adaptation groups significantly outperformed the control group on listening posttest, and did not differ from each other — related