Students of e2L-coached teachers outperformed students in comparison schools on end-of-year STAAR math in a propensity-score-matched study¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims¶

q2 i1 In a real-time matched study of 1,060 6th-8th grade students, students of teachers who received e2L coaching outperformed students in comparison schools with no e2L coaching on end-of-year STAAR math (effect size = +0.13). → engage2learn (e2L): Evidence Rating 2022

Evidence¶

engage2learn (e2L): Evidence Rating 2022¶

engage2learn (e2L): Evidence Rating. (2022). https://www.evidenceforlearning.org

q2 · i1 · causal · r2

Second matched study using propensity score matching to create a well-matched control group for the 1,060 6th-8th grade students in classes of a second cohort of e2L teachers. Students "outperformed students in comparison schools" with the printed effect size +0.13.

"Comparing differences on end-of-the-year STAAR math outcomes showed students of teachers who received e2L coaching outperformed students in comparison schools with no e2L coaching (effect size = +0.13)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students of engage2learn teachers scored significantly higher on NWEA MAP than students of non-e2L teachers in the same schools and in comparison schools — related
• STAAR results in the first e2L study were conflicting: positive versus separate control schools but negative versus non-e2L teachers in the same schools — related
• The intervention significantly benefited 6th-grade students but showed no significant effects for 7th or 8th graders — related