Claims

Students taught Elementary Algebra with e-books showed significantly higher mathematical critical thinking gains than students taught with conventional textbooks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental (e-book) class achieved a significantly better increase in mathematical critical thinking ability than the control (conventional textbook) class, per Mann-Whitney U = 235,000, p = 0.009. → Mursalin 2019

Evidence

Mursalin 2019

Mursalin. (2019). The Critical Thinking Abilities in Learning Using Elementary Algebra E-Books: A Case Study at Public Universities in Indonesia. Malikussaleh Journal of Mathematics Learning (MJML), 2(1), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.29103/mjml.v2i1.2292

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Non-parametric Mann-Whitney test (SPSS 18) on N-gain scores from a nonrandomized pretest-posttest control group quasi-experiment; the article reports "Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) 0.009" and Mann-Whitney U of 235,000, so H0 was rejected.

"Based on Table 4, it can be seen that the value of Sig. < α = 0.05, so H0 is rejected. That is, there is an increase in mathematical critical thinking skills that are taught using the Elementary Algebra E-book, and better than the mathematical critical thinking skills of students who are taught by using conventional textbooks significantly."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.