Claims

ECE benefits both junior and senior preclinical dental students, with a larger pooled effect in junior students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q4 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i3 Significant benefits were observed for junior preclinical students (second year and below, SMD = 1.58) and senior preclinical students (third year and above, SMD = 0.82). → Pang Xuefei 2026

Evidence

Pang Xuefei 2026

Pang Xuefei, Wang Huilin, Li Jinggui, Gui Haijun, Cao Xia, Cai Ming. (2026). The Impact of Early Clinical Exposure on Competency Development in Dental Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Dental Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.109483

q4 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Student-type subgroup analysis of the meta-analysis, defining junior as second year and below and senior as third year and above. Both subgroups were significant; heterogeneity was very high in the junior subgroup.

"Significant benefits were observed for both junior preclinical students (second year and below, SMD = 1.58, 95% CI = 0.79-2.37, I² = 97.5%, P < .001) and senior preclinical students (third year and above, SMD = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.44-1.21, I² = 87.6%, P < .001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.