Claims

Early clinical exposure significantly improves dental students' overall competency compared with traditional teaching (SMD = 1.25), though evidence certainty is low

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q4 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i3 Across 27 studies involving 2995 dental students, students receiving ECE achieved significantly higher overall competency scores than those in traditional teaching groups (SMD = 1.25, 95% CI 0.83–1.66). → Pang Xuefei 2026

Evidence

Pang Xuefei 2026

Pang Xuefei, Wang Huilin, Li Jinggui, Gui Haijun, Cao Xia, Cai Ming. (2026). The Impact of Early Clinical Exposure on Competency Development in Dental Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Dental Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.109483

q4 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Random-effects meta-analysis of 27 studies (2995 students; 1787 ECE, 1211 control) pooling standardised mean differences. The pooled effect was "SMD = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.83-1.66" with I² = 96.6%. GRADE certainty was rated low (serious inconsistency and imprecision).

"Meta-analysis of the 27 included studies showed that students who received ECE achieved significantly higher overall competency scores compared to those in traditional teaching groups (SMD = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.83-1.66, I² = 96.6%, P < .001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.