Claims

Students show a large epistemological split between classroom and research contexts on thinking up their own questions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Only about 30% of students in an introductory calculus-based lab and similar-level courses agree they think up their own questions, while students expect researchers to think up their own questions. → Zwickl 2013

Evidence

Zwickl 2013

Zwickl, B. M., Hirokawa, T., Finkelstein, N., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2013). Development and results from a survey on students views of experiments in lab classes and research. https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.5760 doi:10.48550/arxiv.1307.5760

q2 · i1 · associational · r2

Results from a typical introductory calculus-based lab course at a large public PhD-granting university, reported as formative feedback figures. The article calls this "one of the statements with the largest epistemological splits between what students believe about classroom experiments versus research."

"only about 30% of students in this course and in similar-level courses agree that "When doing an experiment, I usually think up my own questions to investigate." While at the same time, Fig. 4 shows that students do expect researchers to think up their own questions."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id eclass-epistemological-split-own-questions
title Students show a large epistemological split between classroom and research contexts on thinking up their own questions
description Students show a large epistemological split between classroom and research contexts on thinking up their own questions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
recheck_by 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — zwickl-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.