Claims

A team-focused, video-reviewed ED CPR bundle combining mechanical compression device training, in situ simulation, and multidisciplinary video review was followed by higher ROSC

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Implementation of an ED bundle of mechanical chest compression device training, in situ simulation for standardised roles, and multidisciplinary video review with feedback was followed by higher return of spontaneous circulation. → de Sousa Sónia Ferreira 2026

Evidence

de Sousa Sónia Ferreira 2026

de Sousa Sónia Ferreira, Marques Maria do Céu Mendes Pinto, da Silva Amaral Guida Maria Marques. (2026). Factors Influencing the Maintenance of Advanced Life Support Competencies Among Critical Care Professionals: A Scoping Review. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70545

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports this from a pre- and post-evaluation by Rolston et al. of an organisation-level ED redesign. The review notes in its discussion that "causal attribution was limited" for the improved resuscitation process measures and ROSC; no effect size is printed.

"Rolston et al. [40] reported higher return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after implementation of an ED bundle combining mechanical chest compression device training, in situ simulation for standardised roles, and multidisciplinary video review with feedback."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.