Edited voice prompts did not significantly differ from text prompts in first-attempt success¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3
Currency · no dated study recorded · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Students who edited their transcribed voice prompts before submission did not significantly differ from text prompters in immediate success on P1 or P2. → edited-voice
Evidence¶
edited-voice¶
Kaitlin Riegel, Yan Cathy Hua, Paul Denny, Victor-Alexandru Pădurean, Juho Leinonen, James Prather, and Adish Singla. 2026. Say What? Examining Text and Voice Input Modalities for Prompt-Based Programming in Computing Education. Proceedings of the 31st ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1 (ITiCSE 2026). https://doi.org/10.1145/3803400.3809397
q3 · i? · associational · r1
The same logistic regression models across P1 and P2 found edited voice prompts "did not significantly differ" from text (OR𝑃1 = 0.57, p= 0.17; OR𝑃2 = 0.72, p= 0.38); confidence intervals cross 1. The authors suggest students who edit voice prompts may be as likely to succeed as text users.
"students whoeditedtheir voice prompts did not significantly differ (OR𝑃 1= 0.57, 95% CI [0.26, 1.27],p= 0.17; OR𝑃 2= 0.72, 95% CI [0.35, 1.49],p= 0.38)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Adult ESL learners report above-neutral perceptions of ASR as a writing tool on usefulness, ease of use, and intention to use — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Unedited voice prompts have lower odds of first-attempt success than text prompts on two of three Prompt Problems — related
- Students perceived text input as superior for accuracy, control, and editability, with transcription errors a key voice drawback — related
- Initial prompting method did not explain immediate success on the third problem (P3) — related
- Students overwhelmingly used text prompting, and prior modality choice did not predict subsequent choice among dual-mode users — related
- A substantial share of builders' voiced design intentions never reaches the typed prompt, leaving design choices to the production stack's defaults — related
- Greater proportion of voice prompts used correlates moderately with greater stated preference for voice — related
- Students reported mixed, task-dependent perceptions of the efficiency and speed of voice versus text input — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
edited-voice-no-significant-difference |
title |
Edited voice prompts did not significantly differ from text prompts in first-attempt success |
description |
Edited voice prompts did not significantly differ from text prompts in first-attempt success |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-12 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — edited-voice |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.