Claims

The editor accepted Levin's response with no revision and no review, calling it the shortest article of his editorship

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Robinson states the article is both the shortest he accepted in over 5 years as editor and the only one accepted with no revision and no review. → Dan Robinson 2011

Evidence

Dan Robinson 2011

Dan Robinson. (2011). Editor's Note. Educ Psychol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9172-9

q1 · i? · theoretical · r1

A first-person statement of editorial practice by the journal's editor, describing his acceptance decision for this article; it is an untested self-report, not an empirical finding about peer review outcomes generally.

"The following article has the distinction of being both the shortest (in number of words) I have accepted during my 5+years as editor and also the only one that I have accepted with no revision and no review ."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id editorial-accepted-no-review-no-revision
title The editor accepted Levin's response with no revision and no review, calling it the shortest article of his editorship
description The editor accepted Levin's response with no revision and no review, calling it the shortest article of his editorship
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — dan-robinson-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.