The editor reports that Levin's response to poetic-inquiry advocacy was rejected by Educational Researcher without review¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Joel Levin submitted a response to Cahnmann's article to Educational Researcher, and it was rejected without review. → Dan Robinson 2011

Evidence¶

Dan Robinson 2011¶

Dan Robinson. (2011). Editor's Note. Educ Psychol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9172-9

q1 · i? · theoretical · r1

The editorial recounts, as a first-person historical anecdote, that Levin's submitted response was "rejected without review"; the editor attributes this to the leanings of the journal's leadership at the time. No documentary evidence is presented.

"Joel promptly wrote a response that he submitted to the Educational Researcher, but unfortunately it was rejected without review (again, not all that surprising, given the leanings of the powers-that-be behind the Educational Researcher at that time)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The editor characterizes AERA's direction over the past 20 years as less about research and more about politics — related
• The editor accepted Levin's response with no revision and no review, calling it the shortest article of his editorship — related
• The article argues, via satirical verse, that poetic and metaphorical devices could be applied to educational research's pursuit of effects and causes — related