Effects of educational technology literacy interventions differ according to characteristics of the interventions and participants¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Moderator analyses indicate effects of educational technology interventions differ according to particular characteristics of the educational interventions or participants. → Rebecca D. Silverman 2025
Evidence¶
Rebecca D. Silverman 2025¶
Rebecca D. Silverman, Kristin Keane, Elena Hammond, S. Khanna. (2025). The Effects of Educational Technology Interventions on Literacy in Elementary School: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 95(5), 972-1012. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241261073
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?
The meta-analysis conducted moderator analyses over its study corpus, testing whether effects "differ according to characteristics of the educational interventions or participants"; the abstract reports that effects do differ by particular characteristics.
"We also conducted analyses to determine whether effects of educational technology interventions differ according to characteristics of the educational interventions or participants in the studies in our corpus."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Instructional approach, AI technology type, assessment instrument, educational level, and publication year do not significantly moderate AI literacy intervention effects — reports the opposite
- Individual differences and program characteristics impact receptivity and effectiveness of school-based mindfulness training — related
- Most study, measurement, and intervention moderators did not explain significant variance in SRL intervention effect sizes — reports the opposite
- Effects of school-based mindfulness interventions differ according to whether delivery is by an outside facilitator or by trained educators/teachers — related
- Educational technology interventions show positive effects on constrained literacy skills in elementary school — related
- Educational technology interventions show positive effects on unconstrained literacy skills in elementary school — related
- Effect sizes of educational technology literacy interventions differ dramatically across literacy outcomes — related
- Writing intervention effects for US ELL students do not vary significantly by study quality indicators, participant characteristics, or intervention characteristics — related
- Educational technology interventions show positive effects on writing proficiency in elementary school — related
- Educational technology interventions show positive effects on reading comprehension in elementary school — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
edtech-effects-differ-by-intervention-participant-characteristics |
title |
Effects of educational technology literacy interventions differ according to characteristics of the interventions and participants |
description |
Effects of educational technology literacy interventions differ according to characteristics of the interventions and participants |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — rebecca-d-silverman-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.