Claims

School-based EdTech interventions show a moderate positive pooled effect on student attainment (d = 0.4), with high heterogeneity across studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q4
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q4 i? Heterogeneity was high (I² > 95%), indicating significant variability across studies. → Björn Haßler 2025

Evidence

Björn Haßler 2025

Björn Haßler, Bethany Huntington, Christopher Klune, Jennie Lester, Aditi Bhutoria, Hassan Mansour. (2025). Understanding Quality Characteristics of EdTech Interventions and Implementation for Disadvantaged Pupils: Systematic review with meta-analysis. Education Endowment Foundation. https://doi.org/10.53832/opendeved.1170

q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

The same pooled meta-analysis reported very high heterogeneity across included studies, described in the text as "high (I² > 95%)". No moderator fully explains the variability.

"However, heterogeneity was high (I² > 95%), indicating significant variability across studies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.